Web11. feb 2024 · 11 February 2024. The Institute of Public Affairs has today welcomed the historic judgement of the High Court in the case of James Cook University (JCU) v Peter Ridd, which has given Dr Peter Ridd special leave to bring on his final appeal. “This will be the most significant test case for academic freedom in a generation to be settled by the ... Web11. feb 2024 · From The Institute of Public Affairs. High Court To Decide On Peter Ridd Free Speech Case. Gideon Rozner. 11 February 2024. The Institute of Public Affairs has today welcomed the historic judgement of the High Court in the case of James Cook University (JCU) v Peter Ridd, which has given Dr Peter Ridd special leave to bring on his final appeal.
Scientist Peter Ridd gets chance to fight James Cook University
Web29. júl 2024 · Dr Ridd’s legal campaign is being partially funded through crowdfunding, and he is supported by the conservative think-tank the Institute for Public Affairs. He said they estimated it would cost over $600,000 to bring the matter to the High Court, on top of the $1.15 million that had already been spent on the legal proceedings. Web23. jún 2024 · Marine physicist Peter Ridd has finally had his day in the nation’s High Court against his old employer, James Cook University, as his counsel argues the sacked … the tiger club damyns hall
Peter Ridd wins right to take appeal to the High Court
Web24. jún 2024 · Judgement on Dr. Peter Ridd vs. Cook University over an unfair dismissal case, that has attached to it serious implications for freedom of speech in Australia, will … Web11. feb 2024 · Former Professor Peter Ridd was sacked for criticizing his university colleagues at James Cook Uni. He won a $1.2m claim for wrongful dismissal, but JCU appealed, and won the appeal. So Ridd is taking his case to the High Court. Today’s small win merely means they will hear his appeal. WebRidd was first investigated and charged with serious misconduct in 2016 for emailing a journalist to express his criticisms of prominent reef science. The High Court found that in this instance Ridd’s comments were protected by the provisions in his enterprise agreement in force at the time that protected intellectual freedom. setprocesspriorityboost